1,415
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 42:
Line 42: + + + + + +
→SCD hemodynamic effects
|-
|-
| [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18219162/ Sohn et al Circulation J 2008] || Example || Example || Example || Example
| [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18219162/ Sohn et al Circulation J 2008] || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
|Homdee et al Scientific Reports 2026<ref>https://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar.bib?q=info:sqwm0zNm_BAJ:scholar.google.com/&output=citation&scisdr=CoZuVH0GEIjgiyCl0SU:AIL1Nv4AAAAAavSjySUVsxxtbny2m28IhBo-8-o&scisig=AIL1Nv4AAAAAavSjyT2hZWiRRIQgt1kiFdRSsQ0&scisf=4&ct=citation&cd=-1&hl=en</ref>
|12 healthy volunteers
|Simultaneous 50 mmHg, 30 mmHg, or intermittent 30 mmHg via IPCDs
|
|Simultaneous 30 mmHg led to the greatest increase in Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) in the common femoral vein as measured by doppler US, while intermittent led to a slower PSV but longer augmentation, potentially equating to greater total venous return.
|}
|}