Difference between revisions of "SCD Fluid Bolus"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | IDEs can be foregone if any of the exemption criteria at 21 CFR 812.2(c) (Investigational Device Exemptions 2014) are met. [...] A diagnostic device, if the sponsor complies with applicable requirements in 21 CFR 809.10(c) and if the testing: is non-invasive, does not introduce energy into the patients body, has the diagnosis confirmed by a medically accepted alternate method. | ||
| + | |||
=Study Design= | =Study Design= | ||
==Inclusion Criteria== | ==Inclusion Criteria== | ||
| Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
==Exclusion Criteria== | ==Exclusion Criteria== | ||
* LIMITS [https://annalsofintensivecare.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13613-022-01022-8 mnemonic] | * LIMITS [https://annalsofintensivecare.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13613-022-01022-8 mnemonic] | ||
| − | * Low HR/RR ratio | + | ** Low HR/RR ratio |
| − | * Irregular rhythm | + | ** Irregular rhythm |
| − | * Mechanical ventilation w/ low VT | + | ** Mechanical ventilation w/ low VT |
| − | * Increased intra-abdominal pressure (e.g. insufflation) | + | ** Increased intra-abdominal pressure (e.g. insufflation) |
| − | * Thorax Open | + | ** Thorax Open |
| − | * Spontaneously breathing | + | ** Spontaneously breathing |
* Cardiogenic pulmonary edema | * Cardiogenic pulmonary edema | ||
* Tricuspid regurgitation | * Tricuspid regurgitation | ||
| + | * Common adverse effects of both compression stockings and IPC include skin pressure injury, pruritus (itching) and discomfort; and both are contraindicated in people with severe peripheral arterial disease (PAD) [16, 17, 18]. IPC is also contraindicated in people with lower‐limb ischaemia, active skin infection, and active DVT or pulmonary embolism [14, 19]. [https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD016365/full source] | ||
=SCD hemodynamic effects= | =SCD hemodynamic effects= | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ovid MEDLINE(R) ALL <1946 to November 10, 2026> | ||
| + | |||
| + | # (pneumatic sleeve or graduated compression stockings or mechanical thromboprophylaxis or sequential compression device).mp. or Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices/ (n=1479) | ||
| + | # (Passive leg raise or Pulse pressure variation or PPV or volume status or fluid challenge or fluid bolus or fluid responsive*).mp. or Hemodynamics/ or Cardiac Output/ or Fluid Therapy/ or Hypotension/ or Stroke Volume/ or Hypovolemia/ or Dehydration/ or Blood Pressure/ (n=587742) | ||
| + | # 1 and 2 (n=80) | ||
| + | # from 3 keep 2-3,5-6,8,10,12,16-17,21,23-24,30,32-33,35,37,42,44,48-50,52,56,58,62,69,73-75 (n=30) | ||
| + | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|+ Caption text | |+ Caption text | ||
| Line 39: | Line 50: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18219162/ Sohn et al Circulation J 2008] || Example || Example || Example || Example | | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18219162/ Sohn et al Circulation J 2008] || Example || Example || Example || Example | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Homdee et al Scientific Reports 2026<ref>https://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar.bib?q=info:sqwm0zNm_BAJ:scholar.google.com/&output=citation&scisdr=CoZuVH0GEIjgiyCl0SU:AIL1Nv4AAAAAavSjySUVsxxtbny2m28IhBo-8-o&scisig=AIL1Nv4AAAAAavSjyT2hZWiRRIQgt1kiFdRSsQ0&scisf=4&ct=citation&cd=-1&hl=en</ref> | ||
| + | |12 healthy volunteers | ||
| + | |Simultaneous 50 mmHg, 30 mmHg, or intermittent 30 mmHg via IPCDs | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | |Simultaneous 30 mmHg led to the greatest increase in Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) in the common femoral vein as measured by doppler US, while intermittent led to a slower PSV but longer augmentation, potentially equating to greater total venous return. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Yao et al, IJOA, 2026<ref>https://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar.bib?q=info:TO6u4e49AoQJ:scholar.google.com/&output=citation&scisdr=CoZuVH0GEIjgiyCgNw8:AIL1Nv4AAAAAavSmLw8KVm7zjfDZFuQQHEk270k&scisig=AIL1Nv4AAAAAavSmL-PMBf2BW5ICf0v3r0OoZwI&scisf=4&ct=citation&cd=-1&hl=en</ref> | ||
| + | |26 healthy women undergoing elective CD with spinal anesthesia | ||
| + | |Unblinded, RCT, IPC initiation at time of spinal | ||
| + | |No IPCs | ||
| + | |Phenylephrine rate and incidence of hypotension were lower in the IPC group, but the total dose was not different (though it trended to favor IPC). | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:29, 11 November 2026
IDEs can be foregone if any of the exemption criteria at 21 CFR 812.2(c) (Investigational Device Exemptions 2014) are met. [...] A diagnostic device, if the sponsor complies with applicable requirements in 21 CFR 809.10(c) and if the testing: is non-invasive, does not introduce energy into the patients body, has the diagnosis confirmed by a medically accepted alternate method.
Study Design
Inclusion Criteria
- A-line
- GA with paralysis
- NSR
- Positive pressure ventilation
Exclusion Criteria
- LIMITS mnemonic
- Low HR/RR ratio
- Irregular rhythm
- Mechanical ventilation w/ low VT
- Increased intra-abdominal pressure (e.g. insufflation)
- Thorax Open
- Spontaneously breathing
- Cardiogenic pulmonary edema
- Tricuspid regurgitation
- Common adverse effects of both compression stockings and IPC include skin pressure injury, pruritus (itching) and discomfort; and both are contraindicated in people with severe peripheral arterial disease (PAD) [16, 17, 18]. IPC is also contraindicated in people with lower‐limb ischaemia, active skin infection, and active DVT or pulmonary embolism [14, 19]. source
SCD hemodynamic effects
Ovid MEDLINE(R) ALL <1946 to November 10, 2026>
- (pneumatic sleeve or graduated compression stockings or mechanical thromboprophylaxis or sequential compression device).mp. or Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices/ (n=1479)
- (Passive leg raise or Pulse pressure variation or PPV or volume status or fluid challenge or fluid bolus or fluid responsive*).mp. or Hemodynamics/ or Cardiac Output/ or Fluid Therapy/ or Hypotension/ or Stroke Volume/ or Hypovolemia/ or Dehydration/ or Blood Pressure/ (n=587742)
- 1 and 2 (n=80)
- from 3 keep 2-3,5-6,8,10,12,16-17,21,23-24,30,32-33,35,37,42,44,48-50,52,56,58,62,69,73-75 (n=30)
| Reference | Population | Intervention | Comparator | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moady et al IMAJ 2019 | Healthy volunteers and HFrEF patients | Pneumatic sleeve (PS) compression devices applied to both legs from toe to thigh and inflated to a pressure of 50 or 80 mmHg. the same method does not exacerbate symptoms and increases CO via an increase in SV, decreases SVR, and has no effect on HR (see ref 17). | Example | In healthy volunteers, there was increased CO, decrease SVR, and have no effect on HR (see ref 16). HFrEF patients who were medically optimized had no change in any hemodynamic parameter after 60 minutes of PS application, and that they tolerated it well without any increase in their BNP. |
| Bickel et al J of Card Failure 2014 | Patients with HFrEF (mean LVEF 30%) | ISPC devices applied to both legs and cycled every 2 min for 40 min. | Example | Increased CO, SV, and decreased SVR w/o any effect on HR and without causing signs or symptoms of heart failure exacerbation. CVP and atrial size increased during ISPC activation. |
| Gibbons et al Experimental Physiology 2019 | 14 healthy university students | Four 3 minute trials of orthostatic maneuvers (stand-to-squat or thigh cuff compression/release) were done in random order with half of the trials involving ISPC (5 cuffs, peristaltic motion, applied over 200 ms, 65 mmHg, timed to local diastolic phase) of the lower extremity timed to counteract orthostatic changes (return to standing or after thigh-cuff release). Hemodynamic parameters (superficial femoral artery, MAP, Doppler ultrasound cardiac output, total peripheral resistance, middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv), and cerebral tissue saturation index) were measured non-invasively before, during, and after | Example | Decreased TPR, heart rate; increased CO (via increased SV), TSI, and MCAv |
| Helmi et al Future Cardiology 2013 | Example | Example | Example | Example |
| Kiefer et al Anesthesiology 2011 | Example | Example | Example | Example |
| Kwak et al J of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology 2011 | Example | Example | Example | Example |
| Kwak et al Arthroscopy 2010 | Example | Example | Example | Example |
| Fanelli et al J of Clin Anesthesia 2008 | Example | Example | Example | Example |
| Sohn et al Circulation J 2008 | Example | Example | Example | Example |
| Homdee et al Scientific Reports 2026[1] | 12 healthy volunteers | Simultaneous 50 mmHg, 30 mmHg, or intermittent 30 mmHg via IPCDs | Simultaneous 30 mmHg led to the greatest increase in Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) in the common femoral vein as measured by doppler US, while intermittent led to a slower PSV but longer augmentation, potentially equating to greater total venous return. | |
| Yao et al, IJOA, 2026[2] | 26 healthy women undergoing elective CD with spinal anesthesia | Unblinded, RCT, IPC initiation at time of spinal | No IPCs | Phenylephrine rate and incidence of hypotension were lower in the IPC group, but the total dose was not different (though it trended to favor IPC). |
- ↑ https://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar.bib?q=info:sqwm0zNm_BAJ:scholar.google.com/&output=citation&scisdr=CoZuVH0GEIjgiyCl0SU:AIL1Nv4AAAAAavSjySUVsxxtbny2m28IhBo-8-o&scisig=AIL1Nv4AAAAAavSjyT2hZWiRRIQgt1kiFdRSsQ0&scisf=4&ct=citation&cd=-1&hl=en
- ↑ https://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar.bib?q=info:TO6u4e49AoQJ:scholar.google.com/&output=citation&scisdr=CoZuVH0GEIjgiyCgNw8:AIL1Nv4AAAAAavSmLw8KVm7zjfDZFuQQHEk270k&scisig=AIL1Nv4AAAAAavSmL-PMBf2BW5ICf0v3r0OoZwI&scisf=4&ct=citation&cd=-1&hl=en