1,056
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: − + Line 48:
Line 48: − − '''[https://login.liboff.ohsu.edu/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=med13&DO=10.1016%2fj.jclinane.2015.10.018 Comparison of recovery parameters for xenon versus other inhalation anesthetics: systematic review and meta-analysis. [Review]]''' − − Source − Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 29:65-74, 2016 Mar. − − Authors − Hou B; Li F; Ou S; Yang L; Zhou S − − Abstract − STUDY OBJECTIVE: To summarize and evaluate the available data describing the recovery parameters of xenon anesthesia. − − DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. − − SETTING: Anesthesia for elective surgeries. − − PATIENTS: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from databases including Medline (1964-2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 1990-2012), and Google Scholar (1966-2013). − − INTERVENTIONS: Inhalation of xenon or other anesthetics was administered in elective surgery. − − MEASUREMENTS: Recovery parameters (time to recovery, alertness/sedation scale scores at "eye opening," bispectral index at "reaction on demand," time to extubation, and time to orientation). − − MAIN RESULTS: Eleven RCTs (N = 661 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Recovery from xenon anesthesia was significantly faster in terms of the time to eye opening (mean difference [MD], -4.18 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], -5.03 to -3.32 minutes; P < .00001), the time to reaction on demand (MD, -5.35 minutes; 95% CI, -6.59 to -4.11 minutes; P < .00001), the time to extubation (MD, -4.49 minutes; 95% CI, -5.40 to -3.58 minutes; P < .00001), and the time to orientation (MD, -4.99 minutes; 95% CI, -6.45 to -3.52 minutes; P < .00001). − − CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis confirmed that recovery from xenon anesthesia is faster than other inhalation anesthesia. Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. − − Publication Type − Comparative Study. Journal Article. Meta-Analysis. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't. Review. Systematic Review. − − Year of Publication − 2016
no edit summary
7 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 (851731)
7 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 (851731)
8 1 and 7 (119)
8 1 and 7 (119)
9 from 8 keep 15,19,21,37-38,51,57,111,115 (13)
9 from 8 keep 15,19,37-38,51,57,111,115 (13)
***************************
***************************
2017
2017
'''[https://login.liboff.ohsu.edu/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=med9&DO=10.1097%2fEJA.0b013e3283583c4b A xenon recirculating ventilator for the newborn piglet: developing clinical applications of xenon for neonates.]'''
'''[https://login.liboff.ohsu.edu/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=med9&DO=10.1097%2fEJA.0b013e3283583c4b A xenon recirculating ventilator for the newborn piglet: developing clinical applications of xenon for neonates.]'''